CASE LAW FOR VCSST - AN OVERVIEW

case law for vcsst - An Overview

case law for vcsst - An Overview

Blog Article

As the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

If the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according on the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.

As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not still been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner could then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as an important alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and successfully.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it really is unclear how it relates to any specified situation, normally rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances with the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, be certain regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police here and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

10. Based around the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition is not really viewed as maintainable which is therefore liable to generally be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

Report this page